Re: pg_stat_statements vs. SELECT FOR UPDATE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_stat_statements vs. SELECT FOR UPDATE
Date
Msg-id 21151.1547917329@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_statements vs. SELECT FOR UPDATE  (Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_statements vs. SELECT FOR UPDATE  (Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Does the extension need a version bump for this?

We don't bump its version when we make any other change that affects
its hash calculation.  I don't think this could be back-patched,
but Andrew wasn't proposing to do so (IIUC).

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements vs. SELECT FOR UPDATE
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Remove references to Majordomo