Re: AW: Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: AW: Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ...
Date
Msg-id 21145.983460929@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to AW: Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ...  (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Zeugswetter Andreas SB  <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at> writes:
>> it's certainly not what I thought we had agreed to implement.

> Hmm, strange. I thought that we had agreed upon a 32 bit CRC
> on the grounds, that it would be strong enough to guard a single
> log record.

I thought that, and still think it, but I was outvoted.  However I
see no value in the present actual implementation ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Olivier PRENANT
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken?
Next
From: Emmanuel Charpentier
Date:
Subject: Current ODBC driver(s) problems with 7.1