Re: pg_dump/pg_restore items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump/pg_restore items
Date
Msg-id 21104.1220725535@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_dump/pg_restore items  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> What is the state of the following items? I'm a little confused about 
> whether or not work is being done on them.

> . splitting pg_dump/pg_restore schema dumps into pre-data and post-data 
> sections

A patch for that was proposed and rejected in the last fest; I'm not
sure if anyone is trying to bring it up to speed, but it's in the
archives if anyone wants to.

> . parallel pg_restore

I've not heard that anyone has done any work on this.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix an oversight in the 8.2 patch that improved mergejoin
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql