Re: Glitch in handling of postmaster -o options - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Glitch in handling of postmaster -o options
Date
Msg-id 2098.1001864260@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Glitch in handling of postmaster -o options  (Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee>)
Responses Re: Glitch in handling of postmaster -o options
List pgsql-hackers
Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee> writes:
>> I wonder whether we should retire -o.

> How about putting -o stuff after -p?  That way only postmaster
> code can set PGC_POSTMASTER options for a backend, no way for
> user to mess up.  ATM this would break -o -F tho'.

Indeed.  If we're going to force people to change their scripts anyway,
IMHO we might as well go all the way...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marko Kreen
Date:
Subject: Re: Glitch in handling of postmaster -o options
Next
From: Bradley McLean
Date:
Subject: Re: Pre-forking backend