> Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee> writes:
> >> I wonder whether we should retire -o.
>
> > How about putting -o stuff after -p? That way only postmaster
> > code can set PGC_POSTMASTER options for a backend, no way for
> > user to mess up. ATM this would break -o -F tho'.
Not sure what you are suggesting here. Should we keep -o but say all
options after -o are passed to postgres backends:
postmaster -a -b -c -o -f -g -h
In this case, -abc goes to postmaster and -fgh goes to postgres.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
