Re: Making aggregate deserialization (and WAL receive) functions slightly faster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Making aggregate deserialization (and WAL receive) functions slightly faster
Date
Msg-id 2094149.1697388989@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Making aggregate deserialization (and WAL receive) functions slightly faster  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Making aggregate deserialization (and WAL receive) functions slightly faster
List pgsql-hackers
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> I spent more time on this and did end up with 2 new init functions as
> you mentioned.  One for strictly read-only (initReadOnlyStringInfo),
> which cannot be appended to, and as you mentioned, another
> (initStringInfoFromString) which can accept a palloc'd buffer which
> becomes managed by the stringinfo code. I know these names aren't
> exactly as you mentioned. I'm open to adjusting still.

This v3 looks pretty decent, although I noted one significant error
and a few minor issues:

* in initStringInfoFromString, str->maxlen must be set to len+1 not len

* comment in exec_bind_message doesn't look like pgindent will like it

* same in record_recv, plus it has a misspelling "Initalize"

* in stringinfo.c, inclusion of pg_bitutils.h seems no longer needed

I guess the next question is whether we want to stop here or
try to relax the requirement about NUL-termination.  I'd be inclined
to call that a separate issue deserving a separate commit, so maybe
we should go ahead and commit this much anyway.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade's interaction with pg_resetwal seems confusing
Next
From: "Imseih (AWS), Sami"
Date:
Subject: Re: Logging parallel worker draught