Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Why we need to check for local buffers in BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Why we need to check for local buffers in BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty?
Date
Msg-id 20890.1737908397@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why we need to check for local buffers in BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Why we need to check for local buffers in BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Srinath Reddy <srinath2133@gmail.com> writes:
> as suggested did the changes and attached the patch for the same.

Uh ... what in the world is the point of changing
BufferIsExclusiveLocked's signature?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mahendra Singh Thalor
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: Eagerly scan all-visible pages to amortize aggressive vacuum