Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The discussion I saw suggested that you need such a patch at both ends.
> and likely requires a restart of both postgresql and slony afterwards...
Actually, after looking through the available info about this:
https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/ekr/draft-rescorla-tls-renegotiate.txt
I think my comment above is wrong. It is useful to patch the
*server*-side library to reject a renegotiation request. Applying that
patch on the client side, however, is useless and simply breaks things.
regards, tom lane
