On 08/05/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Well, you can go into the documentation source directory and type 'make
> >> postgres.xml' to get an XML formatted DocBook file automatically.
> >>
> >> It has occasionally been suggested to convert the source of the
> >> documentation to XML, but while I'm not opposed to that, I don't see
> >> any specific advantages coming from such a move.
>
> > It would allow us to use xml2po to maintain translations, for one.
>
> Sounds like you can use that today, if you want to; it's just one extra
> step. But would it really be helpful on the documentation? I see where
> .po works for a lot of short, independent error messages, but I don't
> see it being real useful for big manuscripts.
>
Hello! my name is Mario and I've been working in that. For learning
purposes I'm writing the FAQ in a xml document. And, like Alvaro said,
«it would allow us to use xml2po»
So, what can we use for big documents instead?
>
