Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Date
Msg-id 202604051143.f5x6elmc7iut@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]  (Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
List pgsql-hackers
On 2026-Apr-05, Antonin Houska wrote:

> ok, maybe just skip the whole cleanup in that special case.

Hmm, should we make this test only in the db_specific case?  Doing it
unconditionally makes me a bit nervous (maybe because I don't fully
understand historic snapshot building).

Anyway I just pushed the addition of a progress-suppression bit to
index_create() interface.  Here's the rest of the series.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Ninguna manada de bestias tiene una voz tan horrible como la humana" (Orual)

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE
Next
From: Alexander Lakhin
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_plan_advice