On 2026-Apr-04, Robert Treat wrote:
> AFAICS, near misses on wraparound in and of itself have no correlation
> with statistical changes in your data, so I'd agree it isn't
> necessary, and the fact that it behaves differently in this more
> narrow case than it would in the more general case, when these two
> cases are (as far as I've ever known) supposed to behave the same way,
> I'd be +1 to remove this.
Yeah, that matches my impression. +1 to remove it.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"La verdad no siempre es bonita, pero el hambre de ella sí"
