Re: Inval reliability, especially for inplace updates - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: Inval reliability, especially for inplace updates
Date
Msg-id 20251212002437.2f.nmisch@google.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inval reliability, especially for inplace updates  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 04:19:02PM -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
> Thanks for the review.

> The attached version doesn't need a comprehensive re-review, but I'd
> particularly value hearing about any places where you find it's reducing
> comprehensibility rather than enhancing.

I'd like to get this into the back branches well in advance of the 2026-02
releases, in case the buildfarm catches some defect at low probability.  If
there are no objections in the next week, I'll proceed that way.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: Periodic authorization expiration checks using GoAway message
Next
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Add a callback data parameter to GetNamedDSMSegment