Re: Remove unused for_all_tables field from AlterPublicationStmt - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 2025-Nov-10, Peter Smith wrote:

> Therefore, it seems to me that the ALTER PUBLICATION syntax is
> incomplete. e.g. There also needs to be the ability to do  ALTER
> PUBLICATION ADD/SET FOR ALL TABLES;
> 
> Although the member that was removed might be currently unused, won't
> it be needed again whenever those missing  ALTER PUBLICATION ADD/SET
> FOR ALL TABLES are implemented?

Sure, but it's easy to add again later when it is needed.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"I'm always right, but sometimes I'm more right than other times."
                                                  (Linus Torvalds)
https://lore.kernel.org/git/Pine.LNX.4.58.0504150753440.7211@ppc970.osdl.org/