> On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 8:14 AM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 3:22 AM Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>>>
>> > Wouldn't it make sense to also link this list:
>> >
>> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/release-16.html#RELEASE-16-ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
>>
>> I am not sure the fact that his/her name mentioned only once in the
>> release notes qualifies the contributor definition.
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/contributors/
>> > Major Contributors individuals that have provided a sustained stream
>> > of contributions, having substantial positive impact on the
>> > development of the PostgreSQL Community, over many years.
>> >
>> > Contributors individuals that have provided a sustained stream of
>> > notable contributions in recent years.
>>
>> I think these suggest that contributions need to be continued for
>> multiple years, not single year. I maybe wrong but that's my
>> impression.
>
> In attached v2, I tried adding a sentence to the Contributors policy
> page on Recognized Contributors explaining that while one-time code
> contributions are not sufficient alone for inclusion on the Recognized
> Contributors list, you can find the list of contributors to a
> particular release in the Release Notes (with a link to release
> notes). What do you think?
Looks good to me.
Best reagards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
