On 2024-Aug-06, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:21:23AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > After a recent commit f80b09bac8, make update-po fails with "missing
> > required files". The commit moved some files to fe_utils but this
> > change was not reflected in pg_basebackup's nls.mk. The attached patch
> > fixes this issue.
>
> You are right. Still, it is not something that committers are
> required to update when introducing new files, isn't it? I don't see
> why we should be aggressive here for HEAD.
Well, make targets should always work.
> ad8877cb5137 has done a large batch of these for the v17 cycle.
IIUC that's slightly different -- it concerns files that contain
*additional* files that msgmerge need to scan in order to extract
translatable strings. This patch is about fixing bogus file locations
in the makefiles. So without this patch, update-po fails; without the
commit you mention, update-po continues to run, the only problem is it
misses a few files.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"El sentido de las cosas no viene de las cosas, sino de
las inteligencias que las aplican a sus problemas diarios
en busca del progreso." (Ernesto Hernández-Novich)
