Re: broken tables on hot standby after migration on PostgreSQL 16 (3x times last month) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: broken tables on hot standby after migration on PostgreSQL 16 (3x times last month)
Date
Msg-id 20240521152839.o4dom7ervjob73am@awork3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: broken tables on hot standby after migration on PostgreSQL 16 (3x times last month)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2024-05-17 16:03:09 -0400, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 3:50 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > You're saying that the data is correctly accessible on primaries, but broken
> > on standbys? Is there any difference in how the page looks like on the primary
> > vs standby?
> 
> There clearly is. The relevant infomask bits are different. I didn't
> examine it much closer than that, though.

That could also just be because of a different replay position, hence my
question about that somewhere else in the email...



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: zlib detection in Meson on Windows broken?
Next
From: Jelte Fennema-Nio
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq compression (part 3)