Re: Slow GRANT ROLE on PostgreSQL 16 with thousands of ROLEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Slow GRANT ROLE on PostgreSQL 16 with thousands of ROLEs
Date
Msg-id 20240325151647.GA2662364@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Slow GRANT ROLE on PostgreSQL 16 with thousands of ROLEs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Slow GRANT ROLE on PostgreSQL 16 with thousands of ROLEs
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:08:39AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> * The magic constants (crossover list length and bloom filter size)
> need some testing to see if there are better values.  They should
> probably be made into named #defines, too.  I suspect, with little
> proof, that the bloom filter size isn't particularly critical --- but
> I know we pulled the crossover of 1000 out of thin air, and I have
> no certainty that it's even within an order of magnitude of being a
> good choice.

I'll try to construct a couple of tests to see if we can determine a proper
order of magnitude.

> * Code needs more than zero comments.

Yup.

> * Is it worth trying to make a subroutine, or at least a macro,
> so as not to have 2 copies of the code?

I think so.  I'll try that in the next version.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] plpython function causes server panic
Next
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.