On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 09:43:18AM +0100, Mats Kindahl wrote:
> Maybe we should change to use the original version equivalent to the inline
> function above since that works better with surrounding code?
I don't think that's necessary. We just need to be cognizant of it when
using inlined sorts, which are pretty rare at the moment. Your patches
should still be a net improvement in many cases because most qsorts use a
function pointer to the comparator.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
