On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 04:03:44PM +0100, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> I feel like this is the type of change where there's not much
> discussion to be had. And the only way to resolve it is to use some
> voting to gauge community opinion.
>
> So my suggestion is for people to respond with -1, -0.5, +-0, +0.5, or
> +1 to indicate support against/for the change.
I'm +1 for the change, for these reasons:
- Fewer back-patch merge conflicts. The decls section of long functions is a
classic conflict point.
- A mid-func decl demonstrates that its var is unused in the first half of the
func.
- We write Perl in the mixed decls style, without problems.
For me personally, the "inconsistency" concern is negligible. We allowed "for
(int i = 0", and that inconsistency has been invisible to me.
