Re: pg_column_toast_chunk_id: a function to get a chunk ID of a TOASTed value - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Yugo NAGATA |
---|---|
Subject | Re: pg_column_toast_chunk_id: a function to get a chunk ID of a TOASTed value |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20240130133459.b1748c23998201476f49ca59@sraoss.co.jp Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: pg_column_toast_chunk_id: a function to get a chunk ID of a TOASTed value (jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: pg_column_toast_chunk_id: a function to get a chunk ID of a TOASTed value
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:12:31 +0800 jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 8:42 AM Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 08:00:00 +0800 > > jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 8:00 AM jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > minor doc issues. > > > > Returns the chunk id of the TOASTed value, or NULL if the value is not TOASTed. > > > > Should it be "chunk_id"? > > > > Thank you for your suggestion. As you pointed out, it is called "chunk_id" > > in the documentation, so I rewrote it and also added a link to the section > > where the TOAST table structure is explained. > > > > > > you may place it after pg_create_logical_replication_slot entry to > > > > make it look like alphabetical order. > > > > I've been thinking about where we should place the function in the doc, > > and I decided place it in the table of Database Object Size Functions > > because I think pg_column_toast_chunk_id also would assist understanding > > the result of size functions as similar to pg_column_compression; that is, > > those function can explain why a large value in size could be stored in > > a column. > > diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml > index 210c7c0b02..2d82331323 100644 > --- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml > +++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml > @@ -28078,6 +28078,23 @@ postgres=# SELECT '0/0'::pg_lsn + > pd.segment_number * ps.setting::int + :offset > </para></entry> > </row> > > + <row> > + <entry role="func_table_entry"><para role="func_signature"> > + <indexterm> > + <primary>pg_column_toast_chunk_id</primary> > + </indexterm> > + <function>pg_column_toast_chunk_id</function> ( <type>"any"</type> ) > + <returnvalue>oid</returnvalue> > + </para> > + <para> > + Shows the <structfield>chunk_id</structfield> of an on-disk > + <acronym>TOAST</acronym>ed value. Returns <literal>NULL</literal> > + if the value is un-<acronym>TOAST</acronym>ed or not on-disk. > + See <xref linkend="storage-toast-ondisk"/> for details about > + <acronym>TOAST</acronym>. > + </para></entry> > + </row> > > v3 patch will place it on `Table 9.97. Replication Management Functions` > I agree with you. it should be placed after pg_column_compression. but > apply your patch, it will be at > > > > > > There is no test. maybe we can add following to src/test/regress/sql/misc.sql > > > > create table val(t text); > > > > INSERT into val(t) SELECT string_agg( > > > > chr((ascii('B') + round(random() * 25)) :: integer),'') > > > > FROM generate_series(1,2500); > > > > select pg_column_toast_chunk_id(t) is not null from val; > > > > drop table val; > > > > Thank you for the test proposal. However, if we add a test, I want > > to check that the chunk_id returned by the function exists in the > > TOAST table, and that it returns NULL if the values is not TOASTed. > > For the purpose, I wrote a test using a dynamic SQL since the table > > name of the TOAST table have to be generated from the main table's OID. > > > > > Hi > > > the main C function (pg_column_toast_chunk_id) I didn't change. > > > I added tests as mentioned above. > > > tests put it on src/test/regress/sql/misc.sql, i hope that's fine. > > > I placed pg_column_toast_chunk_id in "Table 9.99. Database Object > > > Location Functions" (below Table 9.98. Database Object Size > > > Functions). > > > > I could not find any change in your patch from my previous patch. > > Maybe, you attached wrong file. I attached a patch updated based > > on your review, including the documentation fixes and a test. > > What do you think about this it? > > > > sorry, I had attached the wrong file. > but your v3 also has no tests, documentation didn't fix. > maybe you also attached the wrong file too? > Sorry, I also attached a wrong file. Attached is the correct one. Regards, Yugo Nagata -- Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Attachment
pgsql-hackers by date: