On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:31:14AM -0500, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > On 11/20/22 2:56 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >> I still think it might be worth to backpatch in a bit, but so far the votes on >> that weren't clear enough on that to feel comfortable. > > My general feeling is "yes" on backpatching, particularly if this is a bug > and it's fixable without ABI breaks. Now that commit a4adc31 has had some time to bake and concerns about unintended consequences may have abated, I wanted to revive this back-patching discussion. I see a few possibly-related reports [0] [1] [2], and I'm now seeing this in the field, too. While it is debatable whether this is a bug, it's a quite nasty issue for users, and it's both difficult to detect and difficult to work around. Thoughts? [0] https://postgr.es/m/CAM527d-uDn5osa6QPKxHAC6srOfBH3M8iXUM%3DewqHV6n%3Dw1u8Q%40mail.gmail.com [1] https://postgr.es/m/VI1PR05MB620666631A41186ACC3FC91ACFC70%40VI1PR05MB6206.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com [2] https://postgr.es/m/dd0e070809430a31f7ddd8483fbcce59%40mail.gmail.com -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных