On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 19:21:46 +0000
Laura Smith <n5d9xq3ti233xiyif2vp@protonmail.ch> wrote:
> ------- Original Message -------
> On Friday, October 13th, 2023 at 14:10, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> <jgdr@dalibo.com> wrote:
>
> > But really, double check first why a simple primary-standby architecture
> > doesn't meet your needs. The simpler the architecture is, the better. Even
> > from the application point of view.
> >
>
>
> From my perspective I do wonder why Postgres doesn't have an equivalent to
> MySQL Group Replication.
>
> Although you can run MySQL GR as multi-primary, most people run it as
> primary-standby.
>
> However the difference with Postgres is that MySQL Group does leader
> election. Whilst Postgres failover/failback is a highly manual affair.
PostgreSQL core only cares about primary-standby replication.
Auto-failover must involved various components way outside of the scope of
PostgreSQL itself: the system, the network, sometime the storage, a quorum
mechanism, sometime some fencing, etc.
There's various auto-failover, non manual, solutions in PostgreSQL ecosystems,
they just all live outside of the core.
Regards,
