Re: pg_stat_get_backend_subxact() and backend IDs? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: pg_stat_get_backend_subxact() and backend IDs?
Date
Msg-id 20230829164655.GA2138073@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_get_backend_subxact() and backend IDs?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_get_backend_subxact() and backend IDs?
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:53:52AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I understand that this is not a fantastic naming, but renaming
> pgstat_fetch_stat_local_beentry() to something like
> pgstat_fetch_stat_local_beentry_by_{index|position}_id() would make
> the difference much easier to grasp, and we should avoid the use of
> "beid" when we refer to the *position/index ID* in
> localBackendStatusTable, because it is not a BackendId at all, just a
> position in the local array.

This was my first reaction [0].  I was concerned about renaming the
exported functions so close to release, so I was suggesting that we hold
off on that part until v17.  If there isn't a concern with renaming these
functions in v16, I can proceed with something more like v2.

[0] https://postgr.es/m/20230824161913.GA1394441%40nathanxps13.lan

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Wrong usage of pqMsg_Close message code?
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: broken master regress tests