Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment
Date
Msg-id 20230726212036.GE3310393@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 05:14:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think we should reword this to just generically claim that holding
> the Relation reference open for the whole transaction reduces overhead.

WFM

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: psql: Could we get "-- " prefixing on the **** QUERY **** outputs? (ECHO_HIDDEN)