Re: Remove nonmeaningful prefixes in PgStat_* fields - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Melanie Plageman |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Remove nonmeaningful prefixes in PgStat_* fields |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20230322185223.gxppwjajvvbtx7m6@liskov Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Remove nonmeaningful prefixes in PgStat_* fields ("Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Remove nonmeaningful prefixes in PgStat_* fields
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:05:21AM +0100, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote: > Hi, > > On 3/20/23 8:32 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > > > > /* Total time previously charged to function, as of function start */ > > - instr_time save_f_total_time; > > + instr_time save_total_time; > > I have something to say about this one, though.. I find this change a > > bit confusing. It may be better kept as it is, or I think that we'd > > better rename also "save_total" and "start" to reflect in a better way > > what they do, because removing "f_" reduces the meaning of the field > > with the two others in the same structure. > > Thanks for looking at it! > > Good point and keeping it as it is currently would not > affect the work that is/will be done in [1]. > > So, please find attached V2 attached taking this comment into account. > diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/pgstatfuncs.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/pgstatfuncs.c > index 35c6d46555..4f21fb2dc2 100644 > --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/pgstatfuncs.c > +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/pgstatfuncs.c > @@ -1552,7 +1552,7 @@ pg_stat_get_xact_tuples_inserted(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) > result = 0; > else > { > - result = tabentry->t_counts.t_tuples_inserted; > + result = tabentry->counts.tuples_inserted; This comment still has the t_ prefix as does the one for tuples_updated and deleted. otherwise, LGTM. > /* live subtransactions' counts aren't in t_tuples_inserted yet */ > for (trans = tabentry->trans; trans != NULL; trans = trans->upper) > result += trans->tuples_inserted; > @@ -1573,7 +1573,7 @@ pg_stat_get_xact_tuples_updated(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) > result = 0; > else > { > - result = tabentry->t_counts.t_tuples_updated; > + result = tabentry->counts.tuples_updated; > /* live subtransactions' counts aren't in t_tuples_updated yet */ > for (trans = tabentry->trans; trans != NULL; trans = trans->upper) > result += trans->tuples_updated; > @@ -1594,7 +1594,7 @@ pg_stat_get_xact_tuples_deleted(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) > result = 0; > else > { > - result = tabentry->t_counts.t_tuples_deleted; > + result = tabentry->counts.tuples_deleted; > /* live subtransactions' counts aren't in t_tuples_deleted yet */ > for (trans = tabentry->trans; trans != NULL; trans = trans->upper) > result += trans->tuples_deleted; > @@ -1613,7 +1613,7 @@ pg_stat_get_xact_tuples_hot_updated(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) > if ((tabentry = find_tabstat_entry(relid)) == NULL) > result = 0; > else > - result = (int64) (tabentry->t_counts.t_tuples_hot_updated); > + result = (int64) (tabentry->counts.tuples_hot_updated); > > PG_RETURN_INT64(result); > } - Melanie
pgsql-hackers by date: