Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning
Date
Msg-id 20230318010643.o4idvzy35eoeinx7@jrouhaud
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 01:44:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 08:43:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think the odds of that yielding a usable dump are nil, so I don't
> >> see why we should bother.
>
> > No objection from me.
>
> OK, pushed with the discussed changes.

Great news, thanks a lot!



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: meson issue? ninja clean doesn't drop queryjumblefuncs.funcs.c
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns