Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning
Date
Msg-id 134704.1679075052@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 08:43:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think the odds of that yielding a usable dump are nil, so I don't
>> see why we should bother.

> No objection from me.

OK, pushed with the discussed changes.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Add LZ4 compression in pg_dump
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2