Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command
Date
Msg-id 20230301232633.GA1825532@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 03:13:04PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> FWIW, I think we could rely on va_start() et al to be signal safe. The
> standardese isn't super clear about this, because they aren't functions, and
> posix only talks about functions being async signal safe...

Good to know.  I couldn't tell whether that was a safe assumption from
briefly reading around.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory leak from ExecutorState context?
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT