Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command
Date
Msg-id 20230301043603.GD1453450@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 12:12:27PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-02-26 11:39:00 -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> What precisely did you have in mind?  AFAICT you are asking for a wrapper
>> around write().
> 
> Partially I just want something that can easily be searched for, that can have
> comments attached to it documenting why what it is doing is safe.
> 
> It'd not be a huge amount of work to have a slow and restricted string
> interpolation support, to make it easier to write messages. Converting floats
> is probably too hard to do safely, and I'm not sure %m can safely be
> supported. But basic things like %d would be pretty simple.
> 
> Basically a loop around the format string that directly writes to stderr using
> write(), and only supports a signal safe subset of normal format strings.

Got it, thanks.  I will try to put something together along these lines,
although I don't know if I'll pick up the interpolation support in this
thread.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Normalization of utility queries in pg_stat_statements