Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date
Msg-id 20230214190812.m43wjzgsxbijkm52@awork3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Maciek Sakrejda <m.sakrejda@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi,

On 2023-02-11 10:24:37 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Just pushed the actual pg_stat_io view, the splitting of the tablespace test,
> and the pg_stat_io tests.

One thing I started to wonder about since is whether we should remove the io_
prefix from io_object, io_context. The prefixes make sense on the C level, but
it's not clear to me that that's also the case on the table level.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Force testing of query jumbling code in TAP tests
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning