Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date
Msg-id 20230211182437.ype5tk3awen2htvw@awork3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2023-02-08 21:03:19 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Pushed the first (and biggest) commit. More tomorrow.

Just pushed the actual pg_stat_io view, the splitting of the tablespace test,
and the pg_stat_io tests.

Yay!

Thanks all for patch and review!


> Already can't wait to see incremental improvements of this version of
> pg_stat_io ;). Tracking buffer hits. Tracking Wal IO. Tracking relation IO
> bypassing shared buffers. Per connection IO statistics. Tracking IO time.

That's still the case.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: UUID v7
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Improving inferred query column names