Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: BUG #17717: Regression in vacuumdb (15 is slower than 10/11 and possible memory issue) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: BUG #17717: Regression in vacuumdb (15 is slower than 10/11 and possible memory issue)
Date
Msg-id 20221229182657.GA165622@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #17717: Regression in vacuumdb (15 is slower than 10/11 and possible memory issue)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #17717: Regression in vacuumdb (15 is slower than 10/11 and possible memory issue)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: BUG #17717: Regression in vacuumdb (15 is slower than 10/11 and possible memory issue)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 12:22:58PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> writes:
>>> VACUUM (UPDATE_DATABASE_STATS {yes,no,only})
> VACUUM (DATABASE_STATS {UPDATE,SKIP,ONLY})

+1 for only introducing one option.  IMHO UPDATE_DATABASE_STATS fits a
little better since it states the action like most of the other options,
but I think both choices are sufficiently clear.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: split TOAST support out of postgres.h
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: perl 5.36, C99, -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wshadow=compatible-local