Re: add \dpS to psql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: add \dpS to psql
Date
Msg-id 20221208044314.GD216874@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: add \dpS to psql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 11:25:32PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The fact that we just doubled the number of available bits doesn't
> mean we should immediately strive to use them up.  Perhaps it'd
> be better to subsume these retail privileges under some generic
> "maintenance action" privilege?

That's fine with me, but I wouldn't be surprised if there's disagreement on
how to group the commands.  I certainly don't want to use up the rest of
the bits right away, but there might not be too many more existing
privileges after these three that deserve them.  Perhaps I should take
inventory and offer a plan for all the remaining privileges.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: add \dpS to psql
Next
From: Isaac Morland
Date:
Subject: Re: add \dpS to psql