On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 09:04:41PM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I don't mind fixing it! There are a couple more I'd like to track down
> before posting another revision.
Okay, here is a new version of the patch. This seems to clear up
everything that I could find via the tests.
Thanks to this effort, I discovered that we need to include
wal_retrieve_retry_interval in our wait time calculations after failed
tablesyncs (for the suppress-unnecessary-wakeups patch). I'll make that
change and post that patch in a new thread.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com