Re: perform_spin_delay() vs wait events - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: perform_spin_delay() vs wait events
Date
Msg-id 20221122030118.e3icc34h7id3ouja@awork3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: perform_spin_delay() vs wait events  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: perform_spin_delay() vs wait events
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-11-22 00:03:23 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:01 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > On November 21, 2022 12:58:16 PM PST, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 2:10 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > >+1 for making a group of individual names spin delays.
> >
> > Personally I'm not interested in doing that work, tbh.
> 
> Oh, then I have no objection to the "as is" state, because it doesn't
> exclude the future improvements.  But this is still my 2 cents though.

I added a note about possibly extending this in the future to both code and
commit message. Attached.

I plan to push this soon unless somebody has further comments.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION