Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block
Date
Msg-id 20221117200045.GL11463@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 05:14:07PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> I think this requesting autovacuum worker should be a distinct
> command. Or at least an explicit option to vacuum.

+1.  I was going to suggest VACUUM (NOWAIT) ..

-- 
Justin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] configurable out of disk space elog level
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: redundant check of msg in does_not_exist_skipping