Re: archive modules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: archive modules
Date
Msg-id 20221115171425.afwbze753mex4ndj@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: archive modules  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: archive modules
List pgsql-hackers
On 2022-Nov-15, Nathan Bossart wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:31:44AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> > The surrounding code has changed a bit between PG15 and master, so if we
> > wanted to backpatch this, we'd need another patch from you.  However, at
> > this point, I'm content to just leave it be in PG15.
> 
> Sounds good to me.

Hmm, really?  It seems to me that we will have two slightly different
behaviors in 15 and master, which may be confusing later on.  I think
it'd be better to make them both work identically.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Industry suffers from the managerial dogma that for the sake of stability
and continuity, the company should be independent of the competence of
individual employees."                                      (E. Dijkstra)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)