Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE
Date
Msg-id 20221114234004.GA1771874@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 07:37:38PM -0400, Corey Huinker wrote:
> Patch applies.
> Passes make check and make check-world.
> Test coverage seems adequate.
> 
> Coding is very clear and very much in the style of the existing code. Any
> quibbles I have with the coding style are ones I have with the overall
> pg-style, and this isn't the forum for that.
> 
> I haven't done any benchmarking yet, but it seems that the main question
> will be the impact on ordinary DML statements.
> 
> I have no opinion about the design debate earlier in this thread, but I do
> think that this patch is ready and adds something concrete to the ongoing
> discussion.

Thanks for taking a look!  Here is a rebased version of the patch set.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Suppressing useless wakeups in walreceiver
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow file inclusion in pg_hba and pg_ident files