Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables?
Date
Msg-id 20221012191215.GA1498025@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables?  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 10:13:22AM +1000, Peter Smith wrote:
> PSA a small patch to tidy a few of the GUC C variables - adding
> comments and removing unnecessary declaration assignments.
> 
> make check-world passed OK.

Looks reasonable to me.  I've marked this as ready-for-committer.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Önder Kalacı
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is full on the publisher
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure