Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE
Date
Msg-id 20220930223257.GA190214@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 06:00:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
>> The main one I see is AclItem, which increases from 12 bytes to 16 bytes.
> 
> ... and now requires double alignment ... did you fix its typalign?

Nope, I missed that, thanks for pointing it out.  Should we move ai_privs
to the beginning of the struct, too?  The only other similar example I see
is TimeTzADT, but that only consists of an int64 and an int32, while
AclItem starts with 2 uint32s.  While it might not be strictly necessary,
it seems like there is a small chance it could become necessary in the
future.

> We could conceivably dodge the alignment increase by splitting the 64-bit
> field into two 32-bit fields, one for base privileges and one for grant
> options.  That'd be rather invasive, so unless it leads to pleasant
> improvements in readability (which it might, perhaps) I wouldn't advocate
> for it.

Yeah, the invasiveness is the main reason I haven't tried this yet, but it
does seem like it'd improve readability.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] parenting a PK constraint to a self-FK one (Was: Self FK oddity when attaching a partition)
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v13