Re: archive modules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: archive modules
Date
Msg-id 20220923161402.GA736566@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: archive modules  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: archive modules
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 05:58:42AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 15.09.22 00:27, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Both archive_command and archive_library are PGC_SIGHUP, so IIUC that
>> wouldn't be sufficient.  I attached a quick sketch that seems to provide
>> the desired behavior.  It's nowhere near committable yet, but it
>> demonstrates what I'm thinking.
> 
> What is the effect of issuing a warning like in this patch?  Would it just
> not archive anything until the configuration is fixed?  I'm not sure what
> behavior you are going for; it's a bit hard to imagine from just reading the
> patch.

Yes, it will halt archiving and emit a WARNING, just like what happens on
released versions when you leave archive_command empty.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes