On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 05:05:32PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> Anyway, the only committer that showed some interest in the feature is Michael,
> and he seemed ok in principle with the "alias-implementation" approach.
> Michael, did you have a look at this version ([1]), or do you think it should
> simply be rejected?
After a couple of months I see that there is unfortunately no agreement on this
patch, or even its need.
I think we should close the patch as Rejected, and probably add an entry in the
"Feature we do not want" wiki page.
I will do that in a few days unless someone shows up with new arguments.
