At Fri, 04 Mar 2022 17:28:45 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in
> > By the way, regardless of the patch, I got an error from pg_basebackup
> > for an in-place tablespace. pg_do_start_backup calls readlink
> > believing pg_tblspc/* is always a symlink.
> >
> > # Running: pg_basebackup -D
/home/horiguti/work/worktrees/tsp_replay_2/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/t_029_replay_tsp_drops_primary1_data/backup/my_backup
-h/tmp/X8E4nbF4en -p 51584 --checkpoint fast --no-sync
> > WARNING: could not read symbolic link "pg_tblspc/16384": Invalid argument
>
> So now we know that there are three places that needs the same
> processing.
>
> pg_tablespace_location: this patch tries to fix
> sendDir: it already supports in-place tsp
> do_pg_start_backup: not supports in-place tsp yet.
And I made a quick hack on do_pg_start_backup. And I found that
pg_basebackup copies in-place tablespaces under the *current
directory*, which is not ok at all:(
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
