Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15
Date
Msg-id 20220303071626.c3ok2qz7s2rya25l@jrouhaud
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 03:06:52PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 06:03:06AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >
> > I lost commit with this change. I am sending updated patch.

Also, another thing is the size of the patch.  It's probably the minimum to
have a consistent working implementation, but maybe we can still split it to
make review easier?

For instance, maybe having:

- the pg_variable part on its own, without a way to use them, maybe with
  syscache helpers
- the main session variable implementation and test coverage
- plpgsql support and test coverage
- pg_dump support and test coverage

It wouldn't make the main patch that small but could still help quite a bit.

Any better suggestion?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"