Re: remove more archiving overhead - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: remove more archiving overhead
Date
Msg-id 20220224214853.GA661650@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: remove more archiving overhead  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I tested this again with many more WAL files and a much larger machine
(r5d.24xlarge with data directory on an NVMe SSD instance store volume).
As before, I am using a bare-bones archive module that does nothing but
return true.  Without the patch, archiving ~120k WAL files took about 109
seconds.  With the patch, it took around 62 seconds, which amounts to a
~43% reduction in overhead.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Wong
Date:
Subject: real/float example for testlibpq3
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13