On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 05:19:26PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 5:25 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>> However, I'm not sure about the change to ReadDirExtended(). That might be
>> okay for CheckPointSnapBuild(), which is just trying to remove old files,
>> but CheckPointLogicalRewriteHeap() is responsible for ensuring that files
>> are flushed to disk for the checkpoint. If we stop reading the directory
>> after an error and let the checkpoint continue, isn't it possible that some
>> mappings files won't be persisted to disk?
>
> Unless I mis-read your above statement, with LOG level in
> ReadDirExtended, I don't think we stop reading the files in
> CheckPointLogicalRewriteHeap. Am I missing something here?
ReadDirExtended() has the following comment:
* If elevel < ERROR, returns NULL after any error. With the normal coding
* pattern, this will result in falling out of the loop immediately as
* though the directory contained no (more) entries.
If there is a problem reading the directory, we will LOG and then exit the
loop. If we didn't scan through all the entries in the directory, there is
a chance that we didn't fsync() all the files that need it.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
