On 2021-Oct-29, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 5:23 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > I noticed that the docs for this don't mention the default value and how
> > can it be changed. I propose something like the attached, where I also
> > change the order of things so that the example is in a separate
> > paragraph and the reference blurb is all together.
>
> OK. I don't mind that. I wasn't sure if it was our practice to mention
> the default value in all cases. Maybe I should have checked more
> carefully.
Thanks. I only noticed because I got curious about what the default
was :-)
> > I was also going to complain that this failed to keep the alphabetical
> > order of the entries, but there was quite a mess already before this
> > patch, so I'd rather not get into that.
>
> Well, I suppose that's up to you. :-)
I'll leave that for some other day :-)
--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"This is what I like so much about PostgreSQL. Most of the surprises
are of the "oh wow! That's cool" Not the "oh shit!" kind. :)"
Scott Marlowe, http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2008-10/msg00152.php
