Re: when the startup process doesn't - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: when the startup process doesn't
Date
Msg-id 20210421200032.ojzbrbdhrqw7nroa@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: when the startup process doesn't  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: when the startup process doesn't  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2021-04-21 15:51:38 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> It does seem like we have some trade-offs here to weigh, but
> pg_control is indeed quite small..

What do you mean by that? That the overhead of writing it out more
frequently wouldn't be too bad? Or that we shouldn't "unnecessarily" add
more fields to it?

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: when the startup process doesn't
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)