Hi,
On 2021-03-20 07:32:43 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> No problem from me to keep the rename, and so this leads to the simple
> patch attached, then. Any comments?
- I think there needs to be a reference to the problem, otherwise we'll
just redo this a couple years down the line
- I'd not add the XXX, because the whole idea of durable_rename_excl
seems wrong to me, and it might motivate people to come up with
patches...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
