Re: Key management with tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: Key management with tests
Date
Msg-id 20210318153134.GH20766@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Key management with tests  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: Key management with tests
Re: Key management with tests
List pgsql-hackers
Greetings,

* Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:31:28PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have made significant progress on the cluster file encryption feature so
> > it is time for me to post a new set of patches.
>
> Here is a rebase, to keep the cfbot green.

Good stuff.

> >From 110358c9ce8764f0c41c12dd37dabde57a92cf1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 10:20:32 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] cfe-11-persistent_over_cfe-10-hint squash commit
>
> ---
>  src/backend/access/gist/gistutil.c       |  2 +-
>  src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c |  2 +-
>  src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c     |  2 +-
>  src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c         | 10 +++++-----
>  src/backend/optimizer/util/plancat.c     |  3 +--
>  src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c       |  2 +-
>  src/include/utils/rel.h                  | 10 ++++++++--
>  src/include/utils/snapmgr.h              |  3 +--
>  8 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

This particular patch (introducing the RelationIsPermanent() macro)
seems like it'd be a nice thing to commit independently of the rest,
reducing the size of this patch set..?

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zhihong Yu
Date:
Subject: Re: should INSERT SELECT use a BulkInsertState?
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] [doc] Further note required activity aspect of automatic checkpoint and archving